GREAT ART HAS TWO QUALITIES: "2001" fulfills both these conditions. | |||
Kubrick and Clarke |
1) It is enduring. In the March 1997 issue of Yahoo Magazine, film critic Roger Ebert stated that "2001" was the greatest science fiction film ever made. Considering that this statement is being made 30 years after the film was produced, it shows that "2001" has enduring value. It is generally agreed that there is no comparison between "2001" and "2010." The zenith achieved in "2001" was never equalled. "2001" has become part of our culture. The Newsweek Cyberscope ad for Cyberfest in the Summer of '96 discussed "2001" under the title "Culture." 2) To see evidence of the plethora of interpretations that have been given to this film, see the "Comprehensive List of 2001 Websites," as well as the abundance of books and articles which have been written about the film since 1968. On this note, it is interesting to compare Arthur C. Clarke's novel with the screenplay of "2001" that was written by Clarke and Kubrick. The novel, which preceded the screenplay, was classic science fiction with a very specific storyline. The film, on the other hand, left a lot unsaid; it was open-ended, wide open for interpretation. As stated in the booklet accompanying the Compact Disc of the film's soundtrack, "Kubrick and Clarke resisted the temptation to 'explain' the film's speculations about life, intelligence, and meaning. Like all of the greatest filmmakers, Kubrick insisted on letting his images do the work." That this gave the film a much higher level as an art form was the secret of its box-office success. Because it gave people exactly enough to make them wonder why they didn't understand it, they felt compelled to come back -- and they did. THE "SLEEPWALKERS" In his book The Sleepwalkers, Arthur Koestler describes some of history's greatest geniuses whose epochal discoveries advanced scientific thinking even though they were largely oblivious of the magnitude of their discoveries. In this sense, Kubrick's "2001" provided a very powerful means of solving an old and important philosophical question though he may not have realized the significance of what he had provided. | ||
Kubrick's "2001" provided a very powerful means of solving an old and important philosophical question though he may not have realized the significance of what he had provided |
"What was it all about?" At that moment the "2001" Starchild appears to give the answer. It is an answer filled with cosmic irony. An answer that asks another, rhetorical question. The "2001" Starchild asks: "The monolith was the first evidence of intelligence in the universe other than man. What about me?" In other words, the Starchild is saying: By the year 2001, human civilization will have been around for many thousands of years. In all those thousands of years,why didn't anybody ever consider "me" -- the quintessential complexity inherent in the coming-into-being of every human being that has ever lived. We would add that the way this statement is made is especially pointed. The Starchild turns wide-eyed, until it faces the viewing audience. It then calmly stares us right in the face. This is reminiscent of the way a great contemporary thinker described how we would view reality free of cognitive dissonance: | ||
"Despite all evasions, the ultimate agency of intelligence stares one in the face." |
| ||
|
If you would like to tell your friends about our site, you can order free color postcards. Click here to see a sample.
We hope you liked our site. In the list below you will find links to some of our favorite sites, as well as more details and sources for some of the ideas we have touched on.
SOME OF OUR FAVORITE SITES Comments, questions, and general email If you enjoyed this you may want to explore further: Discovery
Seminar Essentials
Program The
Jerusalem Fellowships Aish
HaTorah HERITAGE HOUSE: This interesting site offers a free Jerusalem Youth Hostel, a "Study-Buddy" service, and "INNERNET" magazine. IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY: A critical study by Dr Michael Behe, Professor of Biology at Lehigh University, of living systems which he contends could not possibly have evolved because they are "irreducibly complex". EXAMPLES OF IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY: Striking animations of the above phenomena. Tour of Jewish and World History: A Bold Presentation Of Jewish And World History And Of Judaism As Portrayed By Traditional / Kabalistic Jewish Sources If
you enjoyed the site, you can download
the entire text. | ||
Comments, questions, and general email to 2001principle@gmail.com |